MANILA, PHILIPPINES — A former district engineer from Bulacan linked two senators to the flood control mess at the resumption of the investigation by the House of Representatives on Tuesday., This news data comes from:http://tkcckdnx.jyxingfa.com
Quoting his boss District Engineer Henry Alcantara, former assistant district engineer Brice Hernandez said Senators Jinggoy Estrada and Joel Villanueva demanded "30 percent" and was "delivered when these items came out in the GAA (General Appropriations Act).| Alcantara denied Hernandez's allegations.
In response, Estrada, in Filipino and English, denied the claims and challenged him to take a lie detector test so that everyone would know who was telling the truth."
Estrada, Villanueva tagged in flood control mess, 'SOP was 30%'
"Talk is cheap. I am ready to prove that all that he said against me were pure lies," he added in a text message.
Hernandez was at the House after Senate President Tito Sotto III allowed him to attend the parallel probe on flood control projects.

Estrada, Villanueva tagged in flood control mess, 'SOP was 30%'
Sotto has granted the request of the House for Hernandez to attend its public hearing, recognizing the principle of inter-parliamentary courtesy.
Hernandez was detained at the Senate on Monday after the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee cited him in contempt for repeatedly denying his alleged casino habits.
- Bureau of Customs seeks missing luxury cars of contractor Sarah Discaya
- Zelenskyy seeks talks with Trump and European leaders on slow progress of peace efforts with Russia
- Alice Guo faces new cases over POGO land
- Manila Water announces service disruption for over 12K households in Mandaluyong due to leak repair
- Marcos denies sister's claim on alleged plot to jail Vice President Duterte
- ₱1.7M shabu seized in Taguig buy-bust
- Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce engaged
- President Marcos launches HD Hyundai Shipyard in Subic
- Tokyo logs record 10 days of 35 C or higher
- Comelec completes ballot printing for Bangsamoro elections despite redistricting dispute